Alaska's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott Israel, other foreign countries, or Alaska's fossil fuel industry, and require state entities to divest from blacklisted companies.
Arizona's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not "discriminate against a firearm entity" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Colorado's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity criteria. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Idaho's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott mining, energy, production agriculture, or commercial timber companies and requires state entities to divest from blacklisted companies. The law also prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it is not currently engaged in a boycott of mining, energy, production agriculture, or commercial timber companies and will not engage in such a boycott for the duration of the contract. The law does not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Indiana's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott energy companies and requires state entities to divest from blacklisted companies. The law also prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it is not currently engaged in a boycott of energy companies and will not engage in a boycott of energy companies for the duration of the contract. The law does not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Indiana's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Kansas's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Kansas's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott energy companies and requires state entities to divest from blacklisted companies. The law also prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it is not currently engaged in a boycott of energy companies and will not engage in a boycott of energy companies for the duration of the contract. The law does not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Kentucky's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Louisiana's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott energy companies, making blacklisted company subject to divestment by the state's retirement systems.
Louisiana's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a financial institution unless the institution submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or other directive" that "discriminates against" a firearm entity or firearm trade association. The law does not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees, or if no contractor that satisfies the requirements can be found.
Louisiana's law would public entities from entering into certain contracts with a company unless the company submitts written certification that it is does not boycott fossil fuel companies. The law does not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Minnesota's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott mining, energy, production agriculture, or commercial timber companies and requires state entities to divest from blacklisted companies. The law also prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it is not currently engaged in a boycott of mining, energy, production agriculture, or commercial timber companies and will not engage in such a boycott for the duration of the contract.
Missouri's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Nebraska's law would prohibit the state from entering into contracts with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it is not currently engaged in a boycott of Israel and will not engage in a boycott of Israel for the duration of the contract The law does not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
New York's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott Israel and requires state entities to divest from blacklisted companies. The law also prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it is not currently engaged in a boycott of Israel and will not engage in a boycott of Israel for the duration of the contract.
New York's law would prohibit any college from using state aid to fund an academic institute if that institute has engaged in boycott of a country that hosts higher education institutions chartered by the university of the state of New York.
New York's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott Israel and require state entities to divest from blacklisted companies.
North Dakota's law would require the state to create a blacklist of financial institutions that boycott energy companies, disqualifying them from receiving state banking contracts.
Oklahoma's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Oklahoma's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott Israel and require state entities to divest from blacklisted companies.
South Carolina's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott Israel, making blacklisted company subject to divestment by the state's retirement systems.
South Carolina's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott energy companies and requires state entities to divest from blacklisted companies. The law also prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it is not currently engaged in a boycott of energy companies and will not engage in a boycott of energy companies for the duration of the contract. The law does not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
South Dakota's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a financial institution unless the institution submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or other directive" that "discriminates against" a firearm entity or firearm trade association.
Virginia's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company that has more than 10 employees, unless the company submits a written certification that it does not engage in a boycott of Israel. The law would also bar public higher education institutions from boycotting Israel.
This federal bill would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not "discriminate against a firearm entity" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract.
This federal bill would criminalize participation in boycotts of Israel, with those found guilty subjected to fines of up to $300,000 in civil cases and up to $1 million in criminal cases. The bill would prohibit US entities from complying with or supporting calls for boycotts of Israel and Israeli settlements by international organizations, including the United Nations Human Rights Council.