Our work relies on the generosity of individuals like you. Your donation helps us fill a media gap on Israel-Palestine through independent storytelling and strategic audience engagement.
From Palestinian Rights to Environmental Sustainability to Gun Safety and Beyond
Since 2015, dozens of states have passed laws intending to silence boycotts of Israel. These anti-boycott bills remove the legal protection that has been awarded to boycotts for generations, granting governments the power to condition jobs on political viewpoints. In recent years, legislators have started using these laws as templates for a wider attack on Americans' ability to use boycotts as a means for social and political change — introducing bills that target boycotts of the fossil fuel and firearms industries, boycotts of companies that fail to offer reproductive health care or gender-affirming care, and boycotts of companies that fail to meet workplace diversity and equity criteria.
Use the filters below to sort by state, issue area and the status of the law. To explore bills introduced but not passed from previous legislative sessions, visit our archive.
Explore the Legislation Archive
Anti-boycott bills from past legislative sessions.
Alabama's law prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not engage in a boycott of the fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, timber or firearms industries or boycott a company over its failure to meet environmental standards, workplace equity standards or failure to provide gender-affirming care or reproductive health benefits.
Arkansas's law prohibits public entities from entering into a contract with a company unless the contract includes a written certification that the company is not engaged in a boycott of the fossil fuels, timber, mining, agriculture or firearms industries. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $75,000.
Arkansas's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that "discriminate" against the fossil fuels, firearms and ammunition industries, or that take into account "environmental, social justice, or governance-related factors" in their investment decisions, including diversity and inclusion policies. The law would require state entities to divest from the blacklisted companies.
Idaho's law requires credit unions and banks holding state funds to sign a written certification that they are not engaged in a boycott of the fossil fuels, timber, mining, hydroelectric power, nuclear power, agriculture and firearms industries.
Idaho's law states that a public entity may not enter into a contract with a company unless the company signs a written certification that they are not engaged in a boycott of the fossil fuels, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear power, agriculture and firearms industries.
Missouri's bill would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the contract includes a written certification that the company is not currently engaged in and shall not, for the duration of the contract, engage in any kind of economic boycott. This bill applies to contracts over $100,000 for businesses with more than ten employees.
Missouri's bill would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the contract includes a written certification that the company is not currently engaged in and shall not, for the duration of the contract, engage in any kind of economic boycott. This bill applies to contracts over $50,000 for businesses with more than ten employees.
Montana's law prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law applies to contracts valued at over $100,000 for companies that have more than 10 employees.
North Dakota's law amends the state's insurance code to limit insurance companies' capacity to enact environmental, social and governance policies, including boycotting due to environmental, social, and governance criteria; diversity, equity, and inclusion policies; or political and ideological factors.
Texas' 2021 law prohibits contracts with companies that "discriminate against the firearm and ammunition industries.” The law does not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
Utah's law amends the state's existing Israel-focused anti-boycott law. It prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not engage in a boycott of Israel, a boycott of the fossil fuel, timber, mining, agriculture or firearms industries or a boycott of a company over its failure to meet environmental standards, or failure to provide gender-affirming care or reproductive health benefits. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.
West Virginia's bill would prohibit a financial institution from engaging in a boycott of the firearms industry and sets forth civil penalties for institutions that do so.