Alabama's law prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not engage in a boycott of the fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, timber or firearms industries or boycott a company over its failure to meet environmental standards, workplace equity standards or failure to provide gender-affirming care or reproductive health benefits.

Arkansas's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that "discriminate" against the fossil fuels, firearms and ammunition industries, or that takes into account any "environmental, social justice, or governance-related factors" in its investment decisions. The law would require state entities to divest from the blacklisted companies. 

Arkansas's law prohibits public entities from entering into a contract with a company unless the contract includes a written certification that the company is not engaged in a boycott of the fossil fuels, timber, mining, agriculture or firearms industries. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $75,000.

Arkansas's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that "discriminate" against the fossil fuels, firearms and ammunition industries, or that take into account "environmental, social justice, or governance-related factors" in their investment decisions, including diversity and inclusion policies. The law would require state entities to divest from the blacklisted companies. 

Idaho's law requires credit unions and banks holding state funds to sign a written certification that they are not engaged in a boycott of the fossil fuels, timber, mining, hydroelectric power, nuclear power, agriculture and firearms industries.

Iowa's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott against the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industries. The law would prohibit blacklisted companies from receiving public contracts. 

Iowa's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott against the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industries. The law would prohibit blacklisted companies from receiving public contracts. 

Iowa's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirmation surgery, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity standards. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $1,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Kansas's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, due to failure to meet workplace equity criteria, or due to failure to meet environmental criteria. The law would require the state to create a blacklist of boycotting companies, and to divest from the blacklisted companies.

Kansas's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, due to failure to meet workplace equity criteria, or due to failure to meet environmental criteria. The law would require the state to create a blacklist of boycotting companies, and to divest from the blacklisted companies.

Kentucky's bill would require certain state contractors to sign a certification that they do not and will not for the duration of the contract engage in a "politically sensitive economic boycott." Broad in scope, the bill specifically mentions a prohibition for contractors to boycott businesses related to fossil fuels, petrochemicals, agriculture, firearms and social media information or internet provider. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees. The law would also require the state to create a blacklist of companies that boycott any of the above-listed sectors, ordering the state's Board of Investment to divest from blacklisted entities and refuse investment in them.

Kentucky's bill would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Michigan's bill would amend the state's "Management and Budget Act" by requiring certain state contractors to sign a certification that they do not and will not for the duration of the contract "economically boycott a business enterprise." Broad in scope, the bill specifically mentions a prohibition for contractors to boycott businesses related to fossil fuels, timber, mining, agriculture and firearms.

Missouri's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirmation surgery, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity standards. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Missouri's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirmation surgery, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity standards. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Missouri's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Nevada's law would expand the state's existing Israel-focused anti-boycott legislation to target a wide range of boycotts. The law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in a boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industries; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, due to failure to meet workplace equity standards, or due to failure to meet environmental standards. The law would not apply to companies that have fewer than 10 employees.

North Dakota's law amends the state's insurance code to limit insurance companies' capacity to enact environmental, social and governance policies, including boycotting due to environmental, social, and governance criteria; diversity, equity, and inclusion policies; or political and ideological factors.

Okalhoma's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity criteria. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Okalhoma's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity criteria. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Oklahoma's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not engage in a boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, or agriculture industries. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Oklahoma's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

South Carolina's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, production agriculture, or timber industry; does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirmation surgery, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity standards; does not take into account "any environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards" in its investment decisions. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees. 

South Carolina's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not have any "practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association" and will not adopt such a practice for the duration of the contract. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

South Dakota's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, due to failure to meet workplace equity criteria, or due to failure to meet environmental criteria.

Texas's 2021 law prohibits contracts with companies that "discriminate against the firearm and ammunition industries.” The law does not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Texas's bill would amend the state's insurance code to limit insurance companies' capacity to enact environmental, social and governance policies, including boycotting the fossil fuels, timber, mining, agriculture and firearms industries, and boycotting companies due to their involvement in immigrant detention centers or due to failure to meet workplace equity standards.

Utah's law amends the state's existing Israel-focused anti-boycott law. It prohibits the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does not engage in a boycott of Israel, a boycott of the fossil fuel, timber, mining, agriculture or firearms industries or a boycott of a company over its failure to meet environmental standards, or failure to provide gender-affirming care or reproductive health benefits. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

West Virginia's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that boycott Israel, disqualifying them from receiving state banking contracts. 

West Virginia's law would make it illegal for financial institutions to "discriminate" against the firearms industry.

Wyoming's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity criteria. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $1,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

This federal law would prohibit the US government from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it does "discriminate" against the firearms industry.