Arkansas's law would require the state to create a blacklist of all companies that "discriminate" against the fossil fuels, firearms and ammunition industries, or that take into account "environmental, social justice, or governance-related factors" in their investment decisions, including diversity and inclusion policies. The law would require state entities to divest from the blacklisted companies. 

Iowa's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirmation surgery, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity standards. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $1,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Kansas's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, due to failure to meet workplace equity criteria, or due to failure to meet environmental criteria. The law would require the state to create a blacklist of boycotting companies, and to divest from the blacklisted companies.

Kansas's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, due to failure to meet workplace equity criteria, or due to failure to meet environmental criteria. The law would require the state to create a blacklist of boycotting companies, and to divest from the blacklisted companies.

Missouri's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirmation surgery, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity standards. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Nevada's law would expand the state's existing Israel-focused anti-boycott legislation to target a wide range of boycotts. The law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in a boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industries; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, due to failure to meet workplace equity standards, or due to failure to meet environmental standards. The law would not apply to companies that have fewer than 10 employees.

Okalhoma's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity criteria. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

Okalhoma's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity criteria. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.

South Carolina's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, production agriculture, or timber industry; does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirmation surgery, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity standards; does not take into account "any environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards" in its investment decisions. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $100,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees. 

South Dakota's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, due to failure to meet workplace equity criteria, or due to failure to meet environmental criteria.

Texas's law would expand the state's existing anti-boycott legislation to target boycotts of the mining, timber, and agriculture industries, as well as boycotts of companies that fail to meet workplace equity standards or environmental standards.

Wyoming's law would prohibit the state from entering into a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it: does not engage in any boycott of the firearms, fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, or timber industry; and does not engage in any boycott of a company due to its failure to provide abortion care or gender affirming care, or due to failure to meet workplace diversity criteria. The law would not apply to contracts valued at less than $1,000 or to companies that have 10 or fewer employees.